Judgments: Issuance, Reasoning, and Res Judicata
Explanation
The procedural rules in the Code of Civil Procedure determine the conditions for issuing a judicial judgment (le jugement), its particulars, its reasoning, and its force, noting that this presentation is an abstract academic explanation to clarify the principles and not the text of the law itself. The path of the judgment begins with the clerk organizing a record to prove the fact of its pronouncement, where the president and the clerk sign it together to officially document the completion of this fact.
The law requires the judgment to include detailed particulars identifying the litigants, their representatives, the course of the lawsuit, their requests, and their evidence. However, it singled out four particulars as mandatory under penalty of nullity (la nullité), which are: the name of the court that issued it, the names, titles, and capacities of the litigants, a summary of the requests they submitted and their grounds, and the grounds of defense or pleas, in addition to the reasoning of the judgment and its operative part (le dispositif). The legislator also mandates, under penalty of nullity as well, that the judgment include a resolution and solution for all issues raised by the litigants and appropriate reasoning for them. Nevertheless, the judgment is not invalidated if it is proven by the case papers, its record, or by any means that the provisions of the law were observed in reality.
The law divides judgments according to their authority and outcome. The final judgment (le jugement définitif) is the one that decides on the merits of the dispute, a part of it, or a plea or defense related to it, and it is final regarding what it has decided. Its direct effect is the removal of the case from the hands of the court (le dessaisissement). This judgment is elevated to become definitive when it is or becomes unappealable by ordinary means of recourse, and then it acquires the status of an absolute or irrevocable judgment (irrévocable) if it is closed to appeal by any ordinary or extraordinary means. In contrast, decisions taken during the consideration of the lawsuit to determine a precautionary or urgent measure are limited to a temporary description.
Regarding litigation costs (les dépens), the court is obligated to decide on them automatically in the judgment ending the dispute, imposing them on the losing litigant, with the permissibility of dividing them among the losers equally or according to the interest of each of them. They are divided equally if the court neglects to determine the percentage, and they are not ordered to pay the costs jointly and severally (la solidarité) unless they are jointly and severally liable in the original obligation adjudicated. Furthermore, the intervener is obligated to pay the costs of their intervention if it is ruled inadmissible or their requests are rejected. Finally, the law prohibits granting a grace period to the judgment debtor, and mandates revoking it at the request of their opponent, in cases of their bankruptcy or insolvency, their reduction of securities or failure to provide them, or the occurrence of an attachment on their funds by other creditors.
Official legal articles
replace · 1985-03-28: Open the official text
Think deeper
How does the obligation to reason the judgment and resolve all raised issues under penalty of nullity relate to the effect of removing the case from the hands of the court once the final judgment is issued?
Flashcards
What is the formal procedure stipulated by the law to prove the pronouncement of the judicial judgment?
The clerk organizes a record to prove the pronouncement of the judgment, which is signed by the president and the clerk (Article 536).
What are the four mandatory particulars in a judgment required under penalty of nullity?
The issuing court name, litigants' names, titles, and capacities, summary of their requests, grounds, pleas, and defense, and the judgment reasoning and operative part (Article 537).
When does the judgment escape nullity despite the omission of one of the mandatory particulars imposed by the law?
If it is proven by the case papers, the trial record, or by any other means that the provisions of the law were observed in reality (Article 537).
What is the direct effect of issuing the final judgment that decides on the merits of the dispute?
The final judgment removes the case from the hands of the court (Article 553).
What is the difference between a definitive judgment and an absolute or irrevocable judgment according to legal rules?
A definitive judgment is one that is not or is no longer subject to appeal by ordinary means, while an absolute or irrevocable judgment is one that is no longer subject to appeal by any ordinary or extraordinary means (Article 553).
When does the court obligate multiple losing litigants to pay the trial costs jointly and severally?
They are ordered to pay the costs jointly and severally if they are jointly and severally liable in their original adjudicated obligation (Article 541).
What are the cases in which granting a grace period for execution to the judgment debtor is prohibited and must be revoked?
Bankruptcy or insolvency of the judgment debtor, reduction of contractual securities, and attachment of their funds by other creditors (Article 539).
Practice questions
Who has the authority to sign the record proving the pronouncement of the judicial judgment according to the law?
The clerk organizes a record to prove the pronouncement of the judgment, which is signed by the president and the clerk (Article 536).
Which of the following judgment particulars results in the nullity of the judgment if omitted, unless it is proven in reality that they were observed?
A summary of the litigants' requests, their grounds, and their pleas is considered a mandatory particular under penalty of the nullity of the judgment (Article 537).
What is the legal outcome if the court omits mentioning the name of the court in the text of the judgment, but it is found in the trial record?
The omission of one of the mandatory particulars does not result in the nullity of the judgment if the observance of the law is proven by the trial record (Article 537).
When does a judicial judgment acquire the description of an absolute or irrevocable judgment that prevents any review?
The judgment acquires the status of an absolute or irrevocable judgment when it is no longer subject to appeal by any ordinary or extraordinary means (Article 553).
How are the trial costs divided if there are multiple losing litigants and the court rules on the costs without determining the percentage each bears?
If they are ordered to pay the costs without determining the percentage each bears, they shall be divided equally among them (Article 541).
What is the legal description of the decision issued by the court to take an urgent measure necessitated by the circumstances of the case during its consideration?
Every decision ordering a precautionary measure or an urgent measure necessitated by the circumstances of the case during its consideration is temporary (Article 555).
Case problems
A court issued a judgment in a civil lawsuit obligating the defendant to pay a financial sum. It became apparent that the copy of the judgment omitted recording the name of the court that issued it, as well as the names and titles of the litigants. However, these particulars were established and detailed in the hearing minutes and the summons and notification papers. The judgment also completely omitted deciding on a formal plea submitted by the defendant, and the court did not indicate the reasons for rejecting or accepting it in the text of its reasoning. The defendant appealed for the nullity of the judgment due to the absence of these mandatory particulars.
Model answer
First, the particulars of the name of the court and the names and titles of the litigants are mandatory under penalty of the nullity of the judgment (Article 537).
Second, the omission of a mandatory particular does not result in nullity if the observance of the law is proven by the trial papers (Article 537). Since the particulars are established in the minutes, this formal omission does not nullify the judgment.
Third, the judgment must include, under penalty of nullity, a resolution for all raised issues and state the appropriate reasons (Article 537).
Conclusion: The judgment is nullified due to its omission to resolve the raised formal plea and its failure to provide appropriate reasoning for it, regardless of the validity of the other formal particulars rectified by the file papers.
Self-grading rubric
The court issued a judgment obligating three defendants together to pay a financial sum equally without joint and several liability among them in the original obligation. The court ruled in its operative part to obligate them to pay the trial costs jointly and severally. In the same judgment, the court ruled inadmissible an intervention request submitted by a third party during the trial, and obligated the original plaintiff to pay the costs of that intervention. The defendants and the plaintiff appealed the costs clause. How is the dispute resolved legally?
Model answer
First, the court orders the losing litigant to pay the trial costs, and they are not ordered to pay jointly and severally unless they are jointly and severally liable in the original obligation (Article 541).
Since the obligation of the defendants is adjudicated without joint and several liability, imposing joint and several liability on them for the costs violates the law. It requires ruling to divide the costs among them equally or in proportion to their interest.
Second, the intervener is ordered to pay the costs of the intervention if their intervention is ruled inadmissible or their requests are rejected (Article 544).
Accordingly, burdening the plaintiff with the costs of the intervention violates the law, and the duty is to obligate the intervener themselves to pay the costs of their inadmissible intervention.
Conclusion: Amending the judgment by canceling the joint and several liability in the original trial costs and dividing them, and burdening the intervener with the costs of their intervention instead of the plaintiff.
Self-grading rubric
A final judgment was issued obligating the judgment debtor to pay a debt to the judgment creditor, and the judge decided in the same judgment to grant the judgment debtor a six-month grace period for payment. After the judgment was issued, the judgment creditor submitted a request to the court asking for two things: first, to revoke the granted grace period due to the proof of an executory attachment placed on the judgment debtor's real estate by another creditor, and second, to amend the amount of the adjudicated compensation by increasing it. How does the court decide on these two requests?
Model answer
First, the final judgment that decides on the merits of the dispute removes the case from the hands of the court (Article 553).
Accordingly, once the mentioned final judgment is issued, the court has relinquished the dispute and the case has left its hands and authority, which prevents it from amending the judgment or reconsidering the subject of the adjudicated compensation.
Second, the grace period granted to the judgment debtor must be revoked in the event of the attachment of their funds by other creditors (Article 539).
Since the funds of the judgment debtor have been attached by another creditor, the conditions for revocation are met, and revoking the grace period becomes mandatory for the court.
Conclusion: Rejecting the request to amend the compensation due to the removal of the case from the hands of the court, and granting the request to revoke the grace period due to the availability of its conditions.